Talcum Powder Lawsuits

Talcum Powder Litigation: J&J LogoA lot of talcum powder lawsuits filed in recent years linking ovarian cancer and talcum powder is a growing source of litigation and public concern.  Talcum powder is used particularly by girls to avoid chafing and as a drying agent between the legs.  It can also be found as a component of many cosmetics. Since talcum powder is not a drug does not undergo the strict testing and approval process that the FDA mandates for medications.   A record verdict was recorded in California Superior Court in Los Angeles in August 2017 in which a woman suffering from ovarian cancer was awarded $417 million. In an SEC filing Johnson& Johnson revealed that it’s been named as a suspect in 3,100 actions involving talc.  There are over 300 other cases pending in California Many of the other state cases are pending in Missouri. The main reason for the Missouri venue is that until a recent Supreme Court ruling Missouri was liberal in getting venue to out of state plaintiffs.

Nature of Talcum Powder Lawsuit Claims

There are 40 Decades of research connecting talc to ovarian cancer, although the studies aren’t yet conclusive.  A report from May of 2016 ascertained that 63 percent of girls with ovarian cancer had utilized talc near or around their genitals.  Other results change from no noticeable rise in danger, to a 33 percent greater risk (Epidemiology 2015).  Researchers aren’t yet sure of the mechanism by which talc can cause ovarian cysts.  A leading theory is that talc particles may enter through the vagina and travel up to the ovaries.  Extended contact over a span of years is exactly what might cause the cancer to create.  Talc is located and mined near asbestos.  One notable issue in a number of the lawsuits is that many choices caused Johnson & Johnson’s reported concealment of crucial details concerning the protection of talcum powder instead of evidence of a direct nexus between talc and cancer.

Multidistrict Litigation in Talcum Powder Lawsuits

Talcum powder cases were combined for the purpose of MDL in October 2016 to simplify and consolidate the litigation process. Cases from around the country may be combined in a single court and judge.

If the cases are not settled or ignored the presiding Judge and parties involved can select one or more platiffs case to litigate.  All these “bellwether” instances Provide advice to additional plaintiffs about if and the way to continue.